Comments on: Dyer’s speech misjudges Iran

By: David

David — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:07:32 +0000

When massive arm shipments are made from the US to Israel, do you think anyone has the right to intercept those ships?
Do you wonder if Iran’s desire for nuclear weapons is simply to counter the existing massive Israeli nuclear arsenal?
Glad you mention the non proliferation treaty. I assume you support the part of it saying existing nuclear weapn’s states should eliminate their arsenal?

By: Ron Levitin

Ron Levitin — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:57:09 +0000

Thanks for the comment, It’s nice to know there are people who care about these issues and want to be informed!

If you’ve got questions/want resources etc., feel free to ask. My original article was nearly twice as long, so there is lots more to be said and lots of info out there.

By: Veronica

Veronica — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:42:46 +0000

Thanks for posting this. I left Dr. Dyer’s presentation with an uncomfortable feeling that some of his arguments were not strongly supported and that there was much more to be told regarding Iranian geopolitics.

By: SepSep

SepSep — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:35:37 +0000

Corrections:
1. Ayatollah Hossein Nousi-Hamedani -> Ayatollah Hossein Nouri-Hamedani
2. Hizballah -> Hezbollah (repeated twice)
3. It’s better to use Iranian Government instead of Iran, I know it’s not wrong to say Iran but considering the disputed election and the government not representing Iran, I believe that’s a better term to be used in most cases.

Overall, it’s a good article. Thanks, I enjoyed reading it!