The new experiential course immerses students in Haudenosaunee culture, reconciliation, and land-based learning through a ten-day canoe journey along the Grand River
This past summer, the Indigenous Studies Department ran for the first time a new course titled "Two Row on the Grand Paddle." Associate Professor Bonnie Freeman led this experiential learning opportunity, which was available to students for the first time.
The course aimed to deepen students' understanding of Haudenosaunee culture, treaty history, and reconciliation through hands-on participation in the annual "Two Row on the Grand Paddle" canoe journey.
Freeman, who is Algonquin Mohawk and a member of the Six Nations of the Grand River Territory, has been involved in the canoe journey for almost ten years. She sees the course as a chance for students to connect what they learn in the classroom with real-life experiences.
"It was important for me to show [students]… that when we learn from an academic perspective, these theories and experiences, it's so much different than when we put them into practice," said Freeman.
It was important for me to show [students]... that when we learn from an academic perspective, these theories and experiences, it's so much different than when we put them into practice.
Bonnie Freeman, Associate Professor
Indigenous Studies Department
She stressed that this course was not just an academic exercise but an immersive experience intended to build connections with Indigenous teachings, the land, and one another.
The "Two Row on the Grand" journey is based on the historical Two Row [Gaswéñdah] Wampum Treaty between the Haudenosaunee and Dutch settlers. During the course, students canoed along the Grand River, which is tied to the Haldimand Treaty lands. They had the opportunity to engage with traditional Indigenous teachings and cultural practices and participate in discussions regarding reconciliation throughout the ten day journey.
Freeman’s engagement with land-based Indigenous learning began during her university days. The idea for this course stemmed from those early experiences. "It was a spiritual journey, and I was immersed in the ceremony, with horses, on the land, and learning those teachings," said Freeman, reflecting on her first exposure to land-based learning. Her passion for integrating these life-changing experiences into academic programs has driven her commitment to making the canoe journey a part of the Indigenous Studies Department's course offerings.
According to Freeman, the course was received with great enthusiasm from the student. "They said it was completely life-changing for them," said Freeman. She added that students appreciated the opportunity to apply what they had been learning in classrooms in a meaningful and practical manner.
The course involved facing physical challenges like navigating rapids and developing paddling skills. It also focused on promoting reconciliation in a practical and community-based manner. The course highlighted the importance of establishing connections with the land and between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities.
Freeman recalled how some students reflected on the experience. "What was important... about reconciliation is the day-to-day living and the importance of having those relationships and establishing them," said Freeman.
The "Two Row on the Grand Paddle" course establishes a standard for expanding experiential learning within Indigenous studies as the Indigenous Studies Department expands its course offerings.
To enrol in Bonnie Freeman’s land-based learning course, students should review McMaster University’s offerings in Indigenous Studies or Social Work. Registration opens on the Two Row Paddle website in mid-March 2025, and the course is primarily aimed at third —and fourth-year students with relevant academic backgrounds. For detailed information and guidance, students are encouraged to consult academic advisors. As the course involves hands-on, experiential learning, it offers a unique opportunity to engage deeply with Indigenous knowledge and practices, fostering meaningful steps toward reconciliation.
City to request a one-year extension from ministry after failing to negotiate with the Haudenosaunee
The city’s efforts to dredge Chedoke Creek following a 24-billion-litre sewage spill have been temporarily paused, following conflicts with the Haudenosaunee Development Institute. As a result, the city has requested the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to extend their Dec. 31, 2022 deadline to Dec. 31, 2023 and to order the HDI to allow the city to resume work.
The Chedoke Creek cleanup efforts are based on the discovery of an open sewer overflow tank gate from 2014 to 2018. The gate was found to have released 24 billion litres of untreated sewage and stormwater, including 4,200 tonnes of pollutants, into Chedoke Creek and Cootes Paradise. Details of the extent of damage were kept from the public until the Spectator published confidential files in Nov. 2019 outlining the city’s efforts to keep the incident from the public, dubbing it “sewergate”.
After apologies from the mayor and council, the city immediately received orders from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to evaluate and address the damage. The ministry also pressed charges against the city for violating statutes in the Environmental Protection Act.
Preparation for targeted dredging of the Chedoke Creek sewage spill started in late-August but was halted several times after disagreements over the HDI’s requests for the City to have their consent and approval, based on treaty rights.
Matthew Grant, city spokesperson, described the conflict as unresolvable by municipal legislation.
“And I know, legally speaking, the Crown has a duty to consult. There's no duty to seek consent. We have been engaging with [the HDI] with consultation. The desire to have them as the governing authority seeking consent on the project would require a change in provincial law. And that's not a law that we can change,” said Grant.
Aaron Detlor, delegate and general counsel for the HDI, referred to the Supreme Court ruling of Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia in 2014, that the government has a duty to consult and accommodate Indigenous groups, or ask for consent, to avoid infringement on Indigenous titles. He claims that the city has not adequately consulted with the HDI and has not accommodated for the HDI’s independent reviews of the dredging plan by providing funds.
The city attempted to resume work in mid-September but was faced with obstructions on the construction site by members claiming to be affiliated with the HDI, according to Grant.
Nick Winters, director of Hamilton Water, described the various disruptions that workers have faced during the project, in a media conference. Issues such as blocking access to the site, refusing to comply with health and safety processes and an incident involving stolen equipment and tools from a dredging machine have prevented workers from continuing the project.
Detlor argued individuals associated with the HDI have been present at the site, but have not been unlawful, created a nuisance or blocked or stolen equipment. He claimed the city was wrongly attributing such events to the HDI.
“We talked to the contractor and they realized that [the stolen equipment] wasn't us whatsoever. We had nothing to do with that. And the fact that the city tried to slander us by including us in that allegation, it's not honourable. It's not reasonable. It's not appropriate . . . This is really the city trying to criminalize Indigenous people for exercising rights because the city knows that it messed up,” said Detlor.
City staff have consulted with the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation, the Huron-Wendat Nation, the Six Nations of the Grand River and the HDI on hiring Indigenous Environmental Monitors from each nation that attend the work site for the duration of the project, with a pay cap of $40,000. Currently, the HDI has requested their monitors to be compensated $350,000, said Winters.
“[The request] is far above and beyond what this one has been requested by the other Indigenous nations. And it's also beyond any authority that city staff have, to provide that type of funding to one of the Indigenous nations as part of this project,” said Winters.
Detlor stated that the extra costs were for independent reviews of city reports and consultations, internal communication with members of Six Nations, information dissemination to Indigenous communities and engagements with the city.
“The reason that we're here is because we fervently believe that we have an obligation to the environment. We have an obligation to Mother Earth. And we're doing this not because of money, any type of publicity or issues. We just want to see a real cleanup done that puts this creek back in the shape it was or better than it was before the spill,” said Detlor.
Detlor also stated that the HDI will continue to exercise treaty rights regardless of the outcomes of the city’s request to the MECP.
The delays as of Oct. 3 have added $466,000 to the original project quote of 6 million dollars. The city has stated that costs will increase by $10,000-$15,000 daily while the city contractor is on standby.
Winters described factors such as permit extensions and demobilizing and remobilizing contractors as factors that can add additional costs to the project. Moreover, Winters highlighted the potential for the high concentration of nitrogen and phosphorus in the sediment to leach into the water which can create algae blooms.
With the upcoming municipal elections looming on the horizon, mayoral candidates Keanin Loomis, Andrea Horwath and Bob Bratina have advocated for increased transparency and better leadership for the project if elected.
